- Date
- Jul 31, 2016
- Act
- Opened Crossfire Hurricane (OIG)
- Who was hit
- Trump campaign / Papadopoulos FFG tip
- Higher court
- OIG: opening OK; no bias finding on his decision
- Ethics hook
- Start button on the campaign case
Bill Priestap
E.W. “Bill” Priestap · Former FBI Assistant Director, Counterintelligence Division · Crossfire Hurricane opener (OIG) · case-file commentary · primary sources · FBI official — not a judge
Power box
- Office / roles
- Assistant Director, FBI Counterintelligence Division (announced by Director Comey; Strider bio: Dec 2015–Dec 2018); previously SAC Counterintelligence NYFO; section chief CI Division; career FBI from 1998 (FBI press release). Later: Centennial Fellow, Georgetown Walsh SFS; adviser, Strider Technologies (firm bio).
- Appointed / selected
- Career FBI executive — not a Senate-confirmed judge. Named AD Counterintelligence by FBI Director James B. Comey (FBI press release).
- Strongest official act
- July 31, 2016 — per DOJ OIG, then-CD AD E.W. “Bill” Priestap made the decision to open Crossfire Hurricane after Friendly Foreign Government information about Papadopoulos; OIG: opening complied with policy; no documentary/testimonial evidence that political bias influenced his opening decision. Separate: Jan 24, 2017 handwritten Flynn notes (public Flynn docket).
- Whose process / oversight
- DOJ OIG Crossfire Hurricane / FISA review (Horowitz, Dec 2019); Special Counsel Durham report (May 12, 2023); Senate Judiciary written statement on China talent programs (Dec 12, 2018). FISA application errors attributed by OIG to other personnel (incl. later Clinesmith plea) — not a finding that Priestap signed a false FISA.
- Softest / hardest
- Hard = OIG attribution of the Crossfire Hurricane opening decision + public Flynn notes asking “Truth/Admission or to get him to lie…”. Soft = post-Bureau private bio / fellowship (Words).
- Recusal / bar
- N/A as defendant. No criminal indictment of Priestap located for this file. Declining a voluntary Durham interview is not a crime.
- Complaints / oversight
- Sen. Graham Steele-briefing allegation (Claims — allegation ≠ indictment). Grassley/Johnson letter on Durham non-cooperation (inquiry). OIG FISA findings against other FBI personnel.
- Last checked
- Sep 9, 2026 (MT)
- Promise
- Every Fact sentence has a primary PDF or official record. Filing ≠ finding. OIG finding ≠ court. No invented crimes by Priestap. Not a judge.
Quick file
- Identity: E.W. “Bill” Priestap (Edward W. / Edward William) — FBI Counterintelligence AD; not a judge.
- Named AD CI by Director Comey (FBI press release); career from 1998 Chicago per same release.
- Jul 31, 2016: OIG — he opened Crossfire Hurricane after FFG/Papadopoulos information.
- OIG: opening complied with policy; no documentary/testimonial evidence bias drove his opening decision — not a clearance of FISA or the whole Bureau.
- Defensive briefing: OIG quotes his choice not to brief the Trump campaign (judgment call per OIG).
- Jan 24, 2017: handwritten Flynn notes on the public docket (transcription ECF 306-6).
- Durham: Alfa Bank interview yes; Crossfire Hurricane interview declined (report).
- Canonical site: billpriestap.com (apex; www→apex).
He opened Crossfire Hurricane. The Inspector General put his name on that decision. Handwritten notes in the Flynn file ask whether the goal was truth — or to get Flynn to lie so they could prosecute him or get him fired. Durham got an Alfa Bank chat and a pass on Crossfire Hurricane. That is the OIG report, the docket, and the Special Counsel’s own page. It is not a personal criminal conviction. He is a former FBI Counterintelligence chief. Not a judge.
Pattern
Thesis the table forces: the Counterintelligence AD who started the Bureau’s case into a major-party campaign, skipped the defensive briefing, left notes that still define the Flynn fight, then limited what he would tell Durham — while preferred outlets treat every OIG sentence as either total clearance or total proof of a personal crime. Filing ≠ finding. OIG finding ≠ court.
Swipe for all columns →
| Date | Act | Whose process / party was hit | Higher-court / result | Ethics hook |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Early 2016 | Named FBI AD, Counterintelligence | FBI CI Division (Comey announcement) | Office act (FBI PR) | Power seat for Russia CI |
| Jul 31, 2016 | Opened Crossfire Hurricane (OIG) | Trump campaign / Papadopoulos FFG tip | OIG: opening OK under low bar; no bias finding on his decision | Start button on the campaign case |
| Jul 2016 | Chose no defensive briefing (OIG quote) | Trump campaign | OIG: judgment call left to FBI discretion | Investigate first; brief later (or never) |
| Jan 24, 2017 | Handwritten Flynn notes | National Security Advisor Michael Flynn | Public Flynn docket; meaning contested | “Get him to lie… prosecute… or get him fired?” |
| Dec 12, 2018 | Senate written testimony (China talent) | Senate Judiciary / China programs | Official statement PDF | On-record AD words |
| Jun 2, 2021 / May 2023 | Durham: Alfa yes; Crossfire declined | Special Counsel Durham inquiry | Report records limited interview; no Priestap indictment | Talked around the edges |
- Date
- Jul 2016
- Act
- Chose no defensive briefing
- Who was hit
- Trump campaign
- Higher court
- OIG: judgment call
- Ethics hook
- Investigate first
- Date
- Jan 24, 2017
- Act
- Handwritten Flynn notes
- Who was hit
- NSA Michael Flynn
- Higher court
- Public docket; meaning contested
- Ethics hook
- “Get him to lie… or get him fired?”
- Date
- Dec 12, 2018
- Act
- Senate China talent testimony
- Who was hit
- Senate Judiciary record
- Higher court
- Official statement PDF
- Ethics hook
- On-record AD words
- Date
- 2021 / 2023
- Act
- Durham Alfa yes; Crossfire declined
- Who was hit
- Durham inquiry
- Higher court
- Report; no Priestap indictment
- Ethics hook
- Limited sit-down
Cases
Opened Crossfire Hurricane
What happened
DOJ Inspector General Michael E. Horowitz’s review states that following Friendly Foreign Government (FFG) information, a decision was made by then Counterintelligence Division Assistant Director E.W. “Bill” Priestap to open Crossfire Hurricane, reflecting a consensus after multiple days of discussions among senior FBI officials. The OIG examination text says Priestap approved the case opening, was Strzok’s supervisor, and was “the official who ultimately made the decision to open the investigation.” Horowitz concluded that Priestap’s exercise of discretion in opening the investigation complied with Department and FBI policies, and that the OIG “did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that political bias or improper motivation influenced his decision.” That is an official finding about his opening decision. It is not a finding that the later Carter Page FISA applications were clean. It is not a jury verdict. An Electronic Communication opening a case is not a court.
Their words
“Following receipt of the FFG information, a decision was made by the FBI’s then Counterintelligence Division (CD) Assistant Director (AD), E.W. ‘Bill’ Priestap, to open Crossfire Hurricane…” Michael E. Horowitz, Inspector General, written statement, Dec 11, 2019
“We concluded that AD Priestap’s exercise of discretion in opening the investigation was in compliance with Department and FBI policies, and we did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that political bias or improper motivation influenced his decision.” Same Horowitz statement / OIG review
Scope
Official act: opening decision attributed to Priestap by OIG. Separate OIG findings on FISA errors concern other FBI personnel (including later criminal conduct by Kevin Clinesmith). Do not collapse FISA wreckage into a personal-crime finding against Priestap, and do not upgrade the bias-negative sentence into “OIG cleared the entire FBI.”
Higher court / result
OIG finding on the opening decision stood as published. No criminal judgment against Priestap for opening the case located for this file.
Commentary
- Horowitz statement: oig.justice.gov/node/1100 · Archive
- OIG exam excerpt (DOJ): justice.gov PDF · Archive exec (Priestap) · Archive opening chapter · Archive conclusions
- Full public copy: oversight.gov
No defensive briefing for the Trump campaign
What happened
The OIG review records that Priestap considered whether the FBI should conduct defensive briefings for the Trump campaign but ultimately decided that providing such briefings created the risk that “if someone on the campaign was engaged with the Russians, he/she would very likely change his/her tactics and/or otherwise seek to cover-up his/her activities, thereby preventing us from finding the truth.” The OIG wrote that it did not identify any Department or FBI policy that applied to the defensive-briefing choice and “determined that the decision was a judgment call that Department and FBI policy leaves to the discretion of FBI officials.”
Their words
“…if someone on the campaign was engaged with the Russians, he/she would very likely change his/her tactics and/or otherwise seek to cover-up his/her activities, thereby preventing us from finding the truth.” Priestap explanation as quoted in DOJ OIG Crossfire Hurricane review
Scope
Documented OIG quotation of his rationale + OIG characterization as a judgment call. Commentary that skipping a briefing equals “spying on a campaign” is opinion — Claims/Commentary, not an OIG crime finding.
Higher court / result
OIG did not treat the choice as a policy violation. No criminal judgment on this discrete act located for this file.
Commentary
They could have warned the campaign. He chose not to — because the warning might tip someone off. That is the Bureau’s own quoted logic. Call it tradecraft if you want. Call it investigating first and briefing never. Do not pretend the OIG called it illegal.
- OIG opening chapter (defensive briefing discussion): justice.gov PDF · Archive
- Horowitz statement: oig.justice.gov · Archive
Flynn interview notes — “Truth/Admission or to get him to lie…”
What happened
Handwritten notes dated January 24, 2017, attributed in the public Flynn record to Assistant Director of Counterintelligence E.W. Priestap, were produced in the Flynn litigation and unsealed. A court-filed transcription (ECF 306-6 caption: “Notes of Assistant Director of Counterintelligence E.W. Priestap Dated 01/24/2017”) includes the line asking whether the goal was “Truth/Admission or to get him to lie so we can prosecute him or get him fired?” Other transcribed lines include reconsidering whether to show Flynn material if he did not admit; regularly showing subjects evidence to get admissions; giving Logan Act facts to DOJ; and “If we’re seen as playing games, WH will be furious” / “Protect our institution by not playing games.” Bates references in Flynn filings include DOJSCO-700023464. Contemporaneous reporting (Fox, CNN, Just the News, Federalist, Breitbart) quoted the notes; attribution to Priestap was widely reported and matches the ECF caption. The document exists. Meaning is contested. The notes are not a court finding that Priestap ordered a perjury trap.
Their words
“What’s our goal? Truth/Admission or to get him to lie so we can prosecute him or get him fired?” Transcription of Priestap notes, Flynn ECF 306-6 / public docket
Scope
Official act documented: notes on the public docket under his AD title. Not a criminal conviction. Not a judicial finding that every Flynn outcome was predetermined by this page.
Higher court / result
Flynn case later dismissed on government motion (2020); separate from inventing a Priestap conviction out of the notes.
Commentary
You do not write “get him to lie… prosecute him or get him fired” if the plan is a friendly chat with the National Security Advisor. The same page says not to play games. Both lines are on the paper. The country watched Flynn get walked out. The notes are why people still say his name.
- Primary transcription PDF: CourtListener ECF 306-6 · Archive
- Related Flynn production (Doc. 188): CourtListener · Archive
- CourtListener docket: United States v. Flynn
Durham — Alfa Bank interview; Crossfire Hurricane declined
What happened
The Durham report states: “Priestap agreed to provide information to the Office concerning matters related to the FBI’s Alfa Bank investigation, but otherwise declined to be interviewed by the Office on matters related to his role in the Crossfire Hurricane investigation.” The same report cites an OSC Report of Interview of E.W. Priestap on June 2, 2021, including Priestap’s description of people going around him to the “7th Floor,” with Strzok as a concern when he wanted one direction and Strzok and Lisa Page went another. Sens. Chuck Grassley and Ron Johnson quoted the limited-interview sentence in a May 24, 2023, release. Declining a voluntary interview is not a crime. Durham did not indict Priestap on the public charging decisions located for this file.
Their words
“Priestap agreed to provide information to the Office concerning matters related to the FBI’s Alfa Bank investigation, but otherwise declined to be interviewed by the Office on matters related to his role in the Crossfire Hurricane investigation.” Special Counsel John H. Durham, report, May 12, 2023
Scope
Documented: Durham report language on limited cooperation + June 2, 2021 interview write-up citation. Not a conviction. Not proof he “obstructed Durham” as a charged crime on this page.
Higher court / result
No Priestap indictment located from Durham’s public charging record for this rebuild.
Commentary
He would talk Alfa. He would not sit for Crossfire Hurricane. The man who opened the case later limited the Special Counsel who was supposed to dig into how it started. Legal right. Terrible look. Still: declined interview ≠ indictment.
- Durham report (DOJ): justice.gov PDF · Archive (pp. covering Priestap)
- Grassley/Johnson release May 24, 2023: grassley.senate.gov · Archive
Senate written testimony — China’s talent programs
What happened
As FBI Counterintelligence Assistant Director, Priestap submitted written testimony to the Senate Judiciary Committee dated December 12, 2018, on China’s non-traditional collectors and talent-recruitment programs. The five-page PDF is hosted by the Senate Judiciary Committee. That is an official statement in his AD capacity — separate from Crossfire Hurricane findings.
Their words
Primary: Senate Judiciary PDF titled as Priestap testimony for the Dec 12, 2018 hearing record. Quote case-specific lines from the PDF when citing; do not invent hearing Q&A not in the written statement.
Scope
Official on-record AD testimony. Not a Crossfire Hurricane clearance or a personal-crime finding.
Higher court / result
N/A — congressional statement.
Commentary
He could put five pages on China talent programs for the Senate. Keep that in the same file as the Crossfire Hurricane opening. The Bureau’s CI chief knew how to talk on the record when he wanted to.
- Primary: Senate Judiciary PDF · Archive
Named FBI Assistant Director for Counterintelligence
What happened
The FBI announced that Director James B. Comey named E.W. Priestap Assistant Director of the Counterintelligence Division. The Bureau’s release traces his career from 1998 Chicago (organized crime/drugs), post-9/11 counterterrorism, Office of Congressional Affairs / Senate HSGAC detail on IRTPA 2004, Directorate of Intelligence roles, New York Field Office ASAC for intelligence/CI, 2012 CI section chief at HQ, 2013 SAC Counterintelligence New York, then Deputy Assistant Director, Intelligence Operations Branch. The release states he is an attorney and holds master’s degrees in business administration and education administration. Strider Technologies’ bio dates the AD Counterintelligence tour December 2015 through December 2018 and says he retired from the FBI in early 2019 — firm bio, not a personnel file.
Their words
FBI press release title/URL: “E.W. Priestap Named Assistant Director of the Counterintelligence Division.” Official portrait date Jan 28, 2015 (Commons / FBI).
Scope
Identity and office lock. Not a Crossfire Hurricane finding by itself.
Higher court / result
N/A — appointment/selection.
Commentary
Comey put him in the Counterintelligence chair. That is the power seat that opened Crossfire Hurricane months later. Titles first. Episodes next.
- FBI press release: fbi.gov · Archive
- Strider bio: striderintel.com
Words
Senate Judiciary written testimony Dec 12, 2018 (China talent programs) is in Cases. OIG quotes of his explanations (opening rationale; defensive briefing) are in Cases. Durham’s June 2, 2021 interview write-up (7th Floor / Strzok-Page) is summarized in the Durham packet from the report’s citation — not re-hosted as a separate transcript. Post-Bureau: Strider Technologies and Georgetown Centennial Fellow bios are his/firm public materials. No X embeds on this overnight build.
On China he wrote for the Senate. On Crossfire Hurricane, Durham got the limited version. Read the difference.
Money
FBI salary history was not re-pulled as a primary pay table this rebuild. Post-Bureau affiliation: Strider Technologies adviser bio; Georgetown Walsh SFS Centennial Fellow (public bio pages). FEC individual-contribution rows and doge.gov / USAspending personal hits were not locked as a Fact packet this pass — treat third-party donation figures as secondary until extracts are attached.
FEC search: fec.gov · Strider: striderintel.com
Claims not found as findings
Filings, reporting, and adjectives — not upgraded to Fact findings on this page. Filing ≠ finding. OIG finding ≠ court. No invented crimes by Priestap.
- Graham Steele / SSCI “whitewash” allegation — Sen. Lindsey Graham said Priestap was among FBI briefers who whitewashed Steele-dossier reliability to Senate Intelligence and said he would send material to Durham (“potentially another crime”). Epoch Times / Washington Examiner reported those remarks. Allegation / promised referral ≠ indictment. No Priestap indictment on a Steele-briefing theory located. (Former post: graham-ssci.)
- “Opened a hoax” / “spied on the campaign” — outlet and commentary adjectives. OIG attributed the opening and separately found no documentary/testimonial evidence that political bias influenced his opening decision; FISA errors were attributed to others.
- “OIG cleared the entire FBI” — false as a description of the Horowitz review, which found serious FISA problems.
- Strzok-Page texts naming “Bill” — National Review and others identify “Bill” as Priestap in text threads. Context for supervision; not a standalone crime finding. (Former post: strzok-texts.)
- Declassified Priestap text-message file lists — Just the News binder coverage (2025) listing Priestap texts among released files. Journalism about records ≠ each text quoted as Fact here without the primary file attached. (Former post: declassified-texts.)
- Judicial Watch / EOP email interrogatory coverage — Epoch Times reporting on JW discovery. Secondary unless the primary production is hosted. (Former post: judicial-watch.)
- Retirement timing narratives — Fox / Strider / speaker-bio dates. Employment end ≠ finding of misconduct. (Former post: retirement.)
- Durham “should have indicted him” — advocacy. Durham’s public charging record did not include Priestap on this rebuild.
See also
- kevinclinesmith.com — altered Page FISA email; §1001 plea (OIG FISA chapter companion)
- andrewweissmann.com — Mueller SCO lead prosecutor; Manafort / Andersen
- jamesboasberg.com — Clinesmith sentencing judge / FISC
- marymccord.com — former acting AAG National Security
- nellieohr.com — Fusion GPS / Steele period companion
- brandonvangrack.com — SCO / Manafort co-signer
- totetray.com — network index
Sources
- Horowitz written statement (Dec 11, 2019). HTML · Archive
- OIG Crossfire Hurricane examination (DOJ storage). PDF · Archive exec · Archive opening · Archive conclusions
- OIG full public copy: oversight.gov
- Durham report (May 12, 2023). PDF · Archive (Priestap pages)
- Flynn Priestap notes transcription (ECF 306-6). PDF · Archive
- Flynn Doc. 188 production. PDF · Archive
- Senate China testimony (Dec 12, 2018). PDF · Archive
- FBI AD announcement. HTML · Archive
- Grassley/Johnson Durham letter release (May 24, 2023). HTML · Archive
- Strider bio: striderintel.com
- Official portrait: Wikimedia Commons
Changelog
2026-09-09 — v1.5 chrome: one-page power-file (boasberg / clinesmith / weissmann structure) adapted for former FBI Counterintelligence AD (not a judge). Power box = offices/roles. Packets = documented official acts with primary PDFs (OIG Crossfire opening + defensive briefing, Flynn notes ECF, Durham limited interview, Senate China testimony, FBI AD announcement). Fact/Commentary badges, mobile Pattern cards, sticky Cases·Words·Money·Claims·Sources, Person+Article schema, OG/twitter summary_large_image. Canonical billpriestap.com; www→apex. Old posts/* → anchors; posts archived. Stock episode images stripped; official FBI portrait only. No X embeds. Filing ≠ finding. OIG finding ≠ court. No invented crimes. Graham Steele allegation stays Claims. No GoDaddy. No McCord this turn.
He opened it. Horowitz put his name on the decision. The Bureau then ran a counterintelligence case into a major-party campaign. OIG later said the opening paperwork met a low predication bar and that they did not find a document proving his bias. That is not the same as saying the country got a fair shake. The FISA wreckage is the next chapter — and it is not his alibi for the whole shop.